linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: provider: Remove of_gpio_{gate,mux}_clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160208221643.GU4848@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Mon, 8 Feb 2016 14:16:43 -0800
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>
Cc:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: provider: Remove of_gpio_{gate,mux}_clk_setup()
 prototypes

On 02/07, Jyri Sarha wrote:
> On 02/07/16 09:42, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >These functions either never existed or were only used in
> >OF_CLK_DECLARE() macros. Remove the dead prototypes.
> >
> 
> Yes, they were used by OF_CLK_DECLARE() macros. I originally made
> the of_gpio_clk_gate_setup() non static just because the other basic
> clocks were implemented the same way. Actually I do not follow why
> the functions needed to be non static in the first place. Surely the
> declarations can go now after the conversion to a platform driver.
> 

Thanks. There is some exporting of basic type functions for u300.
I'm not entirely sure why we do it there either though.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project