linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: apq8016-sbc: Add DT node for the uSD SDHC interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7h4mdibyc5.fsf@baylibre.com>
Date:	Mon, 08 Feb 2016 15:02:02 -0800
From:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To:	Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>
Cc:	Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: apq8016-sbc: Add DT node for the uSD SDHC interface

Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org> writes:

> On 02/05/2016 12:44 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com> wrote:
>>> Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> Add the necessary properties to enable the SD-card on db410c boards.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>
>>>
>>> I tried this with 2 different SD cards on my dragonboard 410c but it's
>>> not detecting either card.
>> 
>> To be more precise, I tried this patch on v4.5-rc1 and today's
>> linux-next using the default defconfig + CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_MSM=y, and
>> see the same voltage errors on both.
>>
>
> Hi Kevin, thanks for trying this. I got the same with v4.5-rc2, but
> this is expected as it depends on the another recently merged patch
> in linux-next. Perhaps I should have mentioned this in the commit
> message.
>
> Anyway, just checked with next-20160205 and it works for me - tested
> with 3 different cards. Not sure why it does not work for you.
> Could you please check if you have the following patch in your tree:

I re-tested with next-20160205 and it seems to work fine.

Feel free to add

Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>

Thanks,

Kevin