linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Staging: iio: adc: Prefer using the BIT macro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56B85CEA.4070106@metafoo.de>
Date:	Mon, 8 Feb 2016 10:16:26 +0100
From:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To:	Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, jic23@...nel.org, knaack.h@....de,
	pmeerw@...erw.net
Cc:	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Staging: iio: adc: Prefer using the BIT macro

On 02/08/2016 07:48 AM, Bhumika Goyal wrote:
> This patch replaces bit shifting on 1 with the BIT(x) macro.
> 
> This was done with coccinelle:
> 
> @@ int g; @@
> 
> -(1 << g)
> +BIT(g)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com>

Hi,

Thanks for the patch. This looks good.

> ---
>  drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c
> index 0c73bce..ccf3157 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@
>   */
>  #define POLYNOM		0x2F
>  #define POLYNOM_ORDER	8
> -#define HIGHBIT		(1 << (POLYNOM_ORDER - 1))
> +#define HIGHBIT		BIT((POLYNOM_ORDER - 1))

But please drop the extra brackets and resend the patch.

>  
>  struct ad7280_state {
>  	struct spi_device		*spi;
> @@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static ssize_t ad7280_show_balance_sw(struct device *dev,
>  
>  	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n",
>  		       !!(st->cb_mask[this_attr->address >> 8] &
> -		       (1 << ((this_attr->address & 0xFF) + 2))));
> +		       BIT(((this_attr->address & 0xFF) + 2))));

Same here.