linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 04/10] ppc64 ftrace_with

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160208121245.GA921@lst.de>
Date:	Mon, 8 Feb 2016 13:12:45 +0100
From:	Torsten Duwe <duwe@....de>
To:	Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
	Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/10] ppc64 ftrace_with_regs configuration variables

On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 11:34:06AM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Sat 2016-02-06 11:32:43, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 05:18:34PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > [...]
> > > more complicated. Whem I think about it, the change below does similar
> > > job and looks more strightforwad:
> > 
> > Had I only looked closer. That's exactly how I thought it would work
> > in the first place. I'd call that a fix. Full ACK from my side.
> 
> Feel free to merge this into your patch. Or do you want to do
> this in a separate one, please?

My Kconfig/Makefile changes depend on it, but OTOH this change (Fix!)
is independent.

IMHO the right thing would be you resend your second mail from Feb-05,
with your sign-off, my ack, FWIW, and Steven checks it in ;-)

	Torsten