linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Enable and verify MMIO access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56B8A6A0.4080704@linaro.org>
Date:	Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:30:56 +0100
From:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, mark.rutland@....com, sboyd@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Enable and verify MMIO
 access

On 02/01/2016 01:00 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> So far, we have been blindly assuming that having access to a
> memory-mapped timer frame implies that the individual elements of that
> frame frame are already enabled. Whilst it's the firmware's job to give
> us non-secure access to frames in the first place, we should not rely
> on implementations always being generous enough to also configure CNTACR
> for those non-secure frames (e.g. [1]).
>
> Explicitly enable feature-level access per-frame, and verify that the
> access we want is really implemented before trying to make use of it.
>
> [1]:https://github.com/ARM-software/tf-issues/issues/170
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
> ---

Applied to my tree for 4.6.

Thanks

   - Daniel