linux-kernel - Re: [tip:irq/core] genirq: Use a common macro to go through the actions list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56B8B38B.1050401@linaro.org>
Date:	Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:26:03 +0100
From:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:	hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...nel.org, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:irq/core] genirq: Use a common macro to go through the
 actions list

On 02/08/2016 11:48 AM, tip-bot for Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Commit-ID:  aff62cf66ad6065ce04fc3454a11ec19714537fb
> Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/aff62cf66ad6065ce04fc3454a11ec19714537fb
> Author:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> AuthorDate: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:54:13 +0100
> Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> CommitDate: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 11:45:21 +0100
>
> genirq: Use a common macro to go through the actions list
>
> The irq code browses the list of actions differently to inspect the element
> one by one. Even if it is not a problem, for the sake of consistent code,
> provide a macro similar to for_each_irq_desc in order to have the same loop to
> go through the actions list and use it in the code.
>
> [ tglx: Renamed the macro ]
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1452765253-31148-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> ---
>   kernel/irq/handle.c    | 5 ++---
>   kernel/irq/internals.h | 3 +++
>   kernel/irq/manage.c    | 8 +++-----
>   kernel/irq/proc.c      | 2 +-
>   kernel/irq/spurious.c  | 4 +---
>   5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/handle.c b/kernel/irq/handle.c
> index 57bff78..67534d0 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/handle.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c
> @@ -136,10 +136,9 @@ irqreturn_t handle_irq_event_percpu(struct irq_desc *desc)
>   {
>   	irqreturn_t retval = IRQ_NONE;
>   	unsigned int flags = 0, irq = desc->irq_data.irq;
> -	struct irqaction *action = desc->action;
> +	struct irqaction *action;
>
> -	/* action might have become NULL since we dropped the lock */
> -	while (action) {
> +	for_each_action_of_desc(desc, action) {
>   		irqreturn_t res;
>
>   		trace_irq_handler_entry(irq, action);

The merge lost the removal of:

action = action->next;

resulting to the NULL pointer dereference bug spotted by 01.org.

Do you want me to resend a new patch ?

   -- Daniel


-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog