linux-kernel - Re: avr32 build failures in linux-next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VdL4fK+vR4X=etWV7DPdop8azJcnrWr0OkvToqWte3ASw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 8 Feb 2016 18:06:57 +0200
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:	Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>
Cc:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no>,
	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
	Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: avr32 build failures in linux-next

On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com> wrote:

> Not very surprising either.  The number of people using Linux on avr32
> is probably approximately zero, and if anyone is, they're likely still
> running 2.6.32 or thereabouts.

Once I tried up the topic about removal avr32 for good, but looks like
it wasn't a good time. Maybe now is better? It would really reduce a
burden on many drivers.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko