linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpio/sysfs: Add ID parameter for GPIO lines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 8 Feb 2016 11:50:47 +0900
From:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
To:	Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio/sysfs: Add ID parameter for GPIO lines

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
<ricardo.ribalda@...il.com> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Any comment on this?

Oops, sorry for the delay...

>
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
> <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com> wrote:
>> On named GPIOs there is currently no find out their numerical id.
>>
>> Because of this, a GPIO pin named like:
>> /sys/class/gpio/PROG_B
>>
>> cannot be unexported by an application different than the one that
>> exported it.

On the other hand, do you want other applications to be able to
arbitrarily unexport GPIOs they don't own? Well, it's not like it is
not already possible anyway.

>>
>> This patch adds a new parameter to the GPIO line called id, that
>> shows the numerical id of a given GPIO. E.g.:
>>
>> $ cat /sys/class/gpio/PROG_B/id
>> 496
>> $ echo 496 > unexport

What we *really* ought to do is have GPIOs behave like other resources
and be automatically freed when the application using them exits. This
will be made possible by the chardev interface, but is impossible to
achieve using sysfs by design.

Adding Linus to get his thoughts, but this simple read-only attribute
does make sense to me.

Acked-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>

>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-gpio |  1 +
>>  Documentation/gpio/sysfs.txt         |  3 +++
>>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c         | 10 ++++++++++
>>  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-gpio b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-gpio
>> index 55ffa2df1c10..53d78abef4f3 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-gpio
>> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-gpio
>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ Description:
>>             /value ... always readable, writes fail for input GPIOs
>>             /direction ... r/w as: in, out (default low); write: high, low
>>             /edge ... r/w as: none, falling, rising, both
>> +           /id ... r only, GPIO number
>>         /gpiochipN ... for each gpiochip; #N is its first GPIO
>>             /base ... (r/o) same as N
>>             /label ... (r/o) descriptive, not necessarily unique
>> diff --git a/Documentation/gpio/sysfs.txt b/Documentation/gpio/sysfs.txt
>> index aeab01aa4d00..68e1b16e747b 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/gpio/sysfs.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/gpio/sysfs.txt
>> @@ -96,6 +96,9 @@ and have the following read/write attributes:
>>                 for "rising" and "falling" edges will follow this
>>                 setting.
>>
>> +       "id" ... ID used for export/unxexport the GPIO. This value may
>> +               be used by named GPIOs, to find out their numerical id.
>> +
>>  GPIO controllers have paths like /sys/class/gpio/gpiochip42/ (for the
>>  controller implementing GPIOs starting at #42) and have the following
>>  read-only attributes:
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
>> index b57ed8e55ab5..3fc5c7231aae 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
>> @@ -350,6 +350,15 @@ static ssize_t active_low_store(struct device *dev,
>>  }
>>  static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(active_low);
>>
>> +static ssize_t id_show(struct device *dev,
>> +               struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> +{
>> +       struct gpiod_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +
>> +       return  sprintf(buf, "%d\n", desc_to_gpio(data->desc));
>> +}
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(id);
>> +
>>  static umode_t gpio_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
>>                                int n)
>>  {
>> @@ -377,6 +386,7 @@ static struct attribute *gpio_attrs[] = {
>>         &dev_attr_edge.attr,
>>         &dev_attr_value.attr,
>>         &dev_attr_active_low.attr,
>> +       &dev_attr_id.attr,
>>         NULL,
>>  };
>>
>> --
>> 2.6.4
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ricardo Ribalda