linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/8] staging: fsl-mc: static inline function to differentiate root dprc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160208033427.GA29235@kroah.com>
Date:	Sun, 7 Feb 2016 19:34:27 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Lijun Pan <Lijun.Pan@...escale.com>
Cc:	arnd@...db.de, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bhamciu1@...escale.com,
	Lijun.Pan2000@...il.com, bhupesh.sharma@...escale.com,
	german.rivera@...escale.com, agraf@...e.de,
	stuart.yoder@...escale.com, nir.erez@...escale.com,
	itai.katz@...escale.com, scottwood@...escale.com,
	leoli@...escale.com, R89243@...escale.com,
	dan.carpenter@...cle.com, richard.schmitt@...escale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/8] staging: fsl-mc: static inline function to
 differentiate root dprc

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 01:25:47PM -0600, Lijun Pan wrote:
> Define a static inline function is_root_dprc(dev) to tell whether
> a device is root dprc or not via platform_bus_type.
> Remove fsl_mc_is_root_dprc() because is_root_dprc() is simpler
> and easier to understand.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan <Lijun.Pan@...escale.com>
> ---
> v2: use static inline function instead of macro
>     replace the fsl_mc_is_root_dprc with is_root_dprc


This series doesn't apply to my tree anymore, due to another big
patcheset for this subsystem being applied.  Can you please rebase it
against my staging-testing branch of staging.git and resend?

thanks,

greg k-h