linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4 v5] sched,time: reduce nohz

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56B9038C.5050702@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:07:24 -0500
From:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	fweisbec@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org,
	luto@...capital.net, peterz@...radead.org, clark@...hat.com,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 v5] sched,time: reduce nohz_full syscall overhead 40%

On 02/02/2016 12:19 PM, riel@...hat.com wrote:
> (v5: address comments by Frederic & Peter, fix bug found by Eric)
> 
> Running with nohz_full introduces a fair amount of overhead.
> Specifically, various things that are usually done from the
> timer interrupt are now done at syscall, irq, and guest
> entry and exit times.

It looks like nobody has objections to my v5
series.

Is there anything else I need to do before these
patches can get merged?

Also, who is going to merge these patches into
their tree?

Frederic? Thomas? Ingo?


-- 
All rights reversed