[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gJCD4_0j=JA+ogEhp4_QmtoX0G2i4_0d1czCbc19xQjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 22:28:32 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
dietmar.eggemann@....com,
Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 03/13] cpufreq: governor: New sysfs show/store
callbacks for governor tunables
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 08-02-16, 17:09, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> +gov_show_one(sampling_rate);
>> +gov_show_one(sampling_down_factor);
>> +gov_show_one(up_threshold);
>> +gov_show_one(ignore_nice_load);
>> +gov_show_one(min_sampling_rate);
>> +gov_show_one_tunable(cs, down_threshold);
>> +gov_show_one_tunable(cs, freq_step);
>
> Based on the review comments on 1/13, I will do:
> - s/gov_show_one/gov_show_one_common
> - s/gov_show_one_tunable/gov_show_one
OK
Powered by blists - more mailing lists