[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160209231457.GB22327@node.shutemov.name>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 01:14:57 +0200
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
mpe@...erman.id.au,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mm: Some arch may want to use HPAGE_PMD related
values as variables
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 01:26:08PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 21:41:44 +0530 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > @@ -660,6 +660,18 @@ static int __init hugepage_init(void)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > + khugepaged_pages_to_scan = HPAGE_PMD_NR * 8;
> > + khugepaged_max_ptes_none = HPAGE_PMD_NR - 1;
>
> I don't understand this change. We change the initialization from
> at-compile-time to at-run-time, but nothing useful appears to have been
> done.
It's preparation patch. HPAGE_PMD_NR is going to be based on variable on
Power soon. Compile-time is not an option.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists