[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <e773903ed5010cb3a9e445e2cf3a96db3942ff28.1454988792.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 09:16:13 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, juri.lelli@....com
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH V4 1/7] cpufreq: Merge cpufreq_offline_prepare/finish routines
The offline routine was separated into two halves earlier by
'commit 1aee40ac9c86 ("cpufreq: Invoke __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish()
after releasing cpu_hotplug.lock");.
And the reasons cited were, race issues between accessing policy's sysfs
files and policy kobject's cleanup.
That race isn't valid anymore, as we don't remove the policy & its
kobject completely on hotplugs, but do that from ->remove() callback of
subsys framework.
These two routines can be merged back now.
This is a preparatory step for the next patch, that will enforce
policy->rwsem lock around __cpufreq_governor() routines STOP/EXIT
sequence.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
Tested-by: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 36 ++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 9c62bf35b9dc..863ac26c4ecf 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1361,9 +1361,10 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
return ret;
}
-static void cpufreq_offline_prepare(unsigned int cpu)
+static void cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
+ int ret;
pr_debug("%s: unregistering CPU %u\n", __func__, cpu);
@@ -1374,7 +1375,7 @@ static void cpufreq_offline_prepare(unsigned int cpu)
}
if (has_target()) {
- int ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
+ ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
if (ret)
pr_err("%s: Failed to stop governor\n", __func__);
}
@@ -1397,34 +1398,23 @@ static void cpufreq_offline_prepare(unsigned int cpu)
/* Start governor again for active policy */
if (!policy_is_inactive(policy)) {
if (has_target()) {
- int ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
+ ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
if (!ret)
ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
if (ret)
pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor\n", __func__);
}
- } else if (cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu) {
- cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy);
- }
-}
-static void cpufreq_offline_finish(unsigned int cpu)
-{
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
-
- if (!policy) {
- pr_debug("%s: No cpu_data found\n", __func__);
return;
}
- /* Only proceed for inactive policies */
- if (!policy_is_inactive(policy))
- return;
+ if (cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu)
+ cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy);
/* If cpu is last user of policy, free policy */
if (has_target()) {
- int ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
+ ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
if (ret)
pr_err("%s: Failed to exit governor\n", __func__);
}
@@ -1453,10 +1443,8 @@ static void cpufreq_remove_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
if (!policy)
return;
- if (cpu_online(cpu)) {
- cpufreq_offline_prepare(cpu);
- cpufreq_offline_finish(cpu);
- }
+ if (cpu_online(cpu))
+ cpufreq_offline(cpu);
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, policy->real_cpus);
remove_cpu_dev_symlink(policy, cpu);
@@ -2304,11 +2292,7 @@ static int cpufreq_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
break;
case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
- cpufreq_offline_prepare(cpu);
- break;
-
- case CPU_POST_DEAD:
- cpufreq_offline_finish(cpu);
+ cpufreq_offline(cpu);
break;
case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
--
2.7.1.370.gb2aa7f8
Powered by blists - more mailing lists