[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNASSex+Nfpzp-=FGbo7eKCteamvyX_DyZaeRenhpF72ZdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 13:00:47 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: commit 5146e0b05963 is causing a kernel crash on SoCFPGA
Hi Dinh,
Thanks for your report.
2016-02-09 11:35 GMT+09:00 Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> It appears that commit 5146e0b05966 "clk: simplify __clk_init_parent()"
> that is currently in linux-next is causing the following kernel crash on
> SoCFGPA[1].
>
> I have bisected to this commit and doing a revert of the commit fixes
> the issue.
Could you check if the following simple patch fixes your problem?
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -1662,7 +1662,7 @@ static struct clk_core *__clk_init_parent(struct
clk_core *core)
{
u8 index = 0;
- if (core->ops->get_parent)
+ if (core->num_parents > 1 && core->ops->get_parent)
index = core->ops->get_parent(core->hw);
return clk_core_get_parent_by_index(core, index);
Let me ask one more question.
Do SoCFPGA clocks define .get_parent callback even if num_parents <= 1 ?
I just skimmed over driver/clk/socfpga/clk-gate.c
and found it defines .get_parent().
I think a gating clock is usually single-parent (so not need to have
.get_parent),
but I am not sure if this is the case.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists