linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: dt: mailbox: Add TI Message Manager

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABb+yY3kGq_R49Xx4fK3UMqtuFiuv-pXJWvjkEFLPL9xRu5T4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Feb 2016 09:44:20 +0530
From:	Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
To:	Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Cc:	Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>, Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@...com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: dt: mailbox: Add TI Message Manager

On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com> wrote:
> +
> +       msgmgr: msgmgr@...00000 {
> +               compatible = "ti,k2g-message-manager", "ti,message-manager";
> +               #mbox-cells = <1>;
> +               reg-names = "queue_proxy_region", "queue_state_debug_region";
> +               reg = <0x02a00000 0x400000>, <0x028c3400 0x400>;
> +
> +               msgmgr_proxy_pmmc_tx_prio0: pmmc_tx_prio0 {
> +                       ti,queue-id = <0>;
> +                       ti,proxy-id = <0>;
> +               };
> +
> +               msgmgr_proxy_pmmc_rx: pmmc_rx {
> +                       ti,queue-id = <5>;
> +                       ti,proxy-id = <2>;
> +                       interrupt-names = "rx";
> +                       interrupts = <GIC_SPI 324 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> +               };
> +       };
> +
I think we should get rid of consumer specifics from the provider node...

> +...
> +       pmmc {
> +               ...
> +               mbox-names = "tx", "rx";
> +               mboxes = <&msgmgr &msgmgr_proxy_pmmc_tx>
> +                        <&msgmgr &msgmgr_proxy_pmmc_rx>;
> +               ...
> +       };
>
... and have consumers like
       pmmc {
               ...
               mbox-names = "tx", "rx";
               mboxes = <&msgmgr 0 0>
                        <&msgmgr 5 2>;
       };

I leave the IRQ for you to decide how to specify - a 'dummy' or
'valid' always provided as last cell in mboxes or some other way.
(I'll review other patches in detail later)

cheers.