[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1454975631.533857396@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 23:53:51 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
"Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 43/87] ALSA: seq: Fix missing NULL check at
remove_events ioctl
3.2.77-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
commit 030e2c78d3a91dd0d27fef37e91950dde333eba1 upstream.
snd_seq_ioctl_remove_events() calls snd_seq_fifo_clear()
unconditionally even if there is no FIFO assigned, and this leads to
an Oops due to NULL dereference. The fix is just to add a proper NULL
check.
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Tested-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
sound/core/seq/seq_clientmgr.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/sound/core/seq/seq_clientmgr.c
+++ b/sound/core/seq/seq_clientmgr.c
@@ -1950,7 +1950,7 @@ static int snd_seq_ioctl_remove_events(s
* No restrictions so for a user client we can clear
* the whole fifo
*/
- if (client->type == USER_CLIENT)
+ if (client->type == USER_CLIENT && client->data.user.fifo)
snd_seq_fifo_clear(client->data.user.fifo);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists