[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160209093240.GF11240@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 10:32:40 +0100
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net>
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: BUG caused by "Use new drm_fb_helper functions" series
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 06:30:54PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 03.02.2016 03:38, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > On 02/01/2016 09:20 PM, Archit Taneja wrote:
> >> Hi Peter,
> >>
> >> On 02/02/2016 02:07 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> >>> Hi Archit,
> >>>
> >>> Just booting 4.4-rc5+, I got this splat [1]
> >>> At first glance, this appears to be a simple fix.
> >>
> >> Thanks for sharing this.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> However, I'm concerned that fbcon functions, which may be called with
> >>> interrupts disabled, are now hooked up to fbdev functions which may assume
> >>> interrupts are not disabled (as is the case with cfb_imageblit()).
> >>
> >> In the case when CONFIG_FB is enabled, drm_fb_helper_cfb_imageblit
> >> helper simply wraps around cfg_imageblit, so I don't see how we'd have
> >> any difference in behaviour.
> >
> >
> > Sorry; terrible attribution on my part.
> > This bug clearly has nothing to do with this series.
> >
> > But a better look has me wondering how all these gpus are syncing
> > the framebuffer for direct access via cfb_imageblit and friends. I only see
> > nouveau and intel gma even trying.
>
> Probably no other DRM driver uses hardware acceleration for fbcon.
Yup. We've had patches for i915, resulted in half of mesa+glamour in-kernel, which
is just pointless.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists