[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160209102403.GB24522@x1>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 10:24:03 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] mfd: tps65912: Driver rewrite with DT support
On Sat, 06 Feb 2016, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> On 02/02/2016 09:03 AM, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> >On 01/28/2016 07:30 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >>On Thu, 28 Jan 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:04:23PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> >>>>On Thu, 28 Jan 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>>Please be more specific? What is it that you are looking for beyond the
> >>>>>review I already did for the regulator driver?
> >>>
> >>>>Patch 2.
> >>>
> >>>I reviewed that *ages* ago.
> >>
> >>Link or it didn't happen. ;)
> >>
> >
> >Might be best to take his ack for the new regulator driver
> >as approval to remove the old one. :)
>
> If not, is there anything I can do to help keep this from getting
> delayed another cycle?
I don't normally like to assume Acks, but as Mark has been so
insistent that he's already conducted the review, I'm happy to take
that as one. If there is any fall-out over this, I will be pointing
everyone back to this thread,
Leave it with me. This will go in [*].
[*] When I dig myself back out of the pile of emails I have in my
inbox presently.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists