[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-b7f500aedd4551a9bf29c617804c13f0ff18c879@git.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 04:21:54 -0800
From: tip-bot for Borislav Petkov <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
tv@...96.de, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, bp@...e.de
Subject: [tip:x86/microcode] x86/microcode: Issue update message only once
Commit-ID: b7f500aedd4551a9bf29c617804c13f0ff18c879
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/b7f500aedd4551a9bf29c617804c13f0ff18c879
Author: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
AuthorDate: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 12:33:33 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:41:16 +0100
x86/microcode: Issue update message only once
This is especially annoying on large boxes:
x86: Booting SMP configuration:
.... node #0, CPUs: #1
microcode: CPU1 microcode updated early to revision 0x428, date = 2014-05-29
#2
microcode: CPU2 microcode updated early to revision 0x428, date = 2014-05-29
#3
...
so issue the update message only once.
$ grep microcode /proc/cpuinfo
shows whether every core got updated properly.
Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Tested-by: Thomas Voegtle <tv@...96.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1454499225-21544-6-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c | 4 ++--
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 13 +++++--------
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
index 2233f8a..5b63e2f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
@@ -432,8 +432,8 @@ int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_amd(void)
container = cont_va;
if (ucode_new_rev)
- pr_info("microcode: updated early to new patch_level=0x%08x\n",
- ucode_new_rev);
+ pr_info_once("microcode updated early to new patch_level=0x%08x\n",
+ ucode_new_rev);
eax = cpuid_eax(0x00000001);
eax = ((eax >> 8) & 0xf) + ((eax >> 20) & 0xff);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index 4f4735b..f4bc5fe 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -571,14 +571,11 @@ scan_microcode(struct mc_saved_data *mc_saved_data, unsigned long *initrd,
static void
print_ucode_info(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, unsigned int date)
{
- int cpu = smp_processor_id();
-
- pr_info("CPU%d microcode updated early to revision 0x%x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x\n",
- cpu,
- uci->cpu_sig.rev,
- date & 0xffff,
- date >> 24,
- (date >> 16) & 0xff);
+ pr_info_once("microcode updated early to revision 0x%x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x\n",
+ uci->cpu_sig.rev,
+ date & 0xffff,
+ date >> 24,
+ (date >> 16) & 0xff);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
Powered by blists - more mailing lists