[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-26cbaa4dc676a444aa626cbc642c4c8181ef1378@git.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 04:24:02 -0800
From: tip-bot for Borislav Petkov <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: bp@...e.de, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tv@...96.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: [tip:x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel:
Cleanup apply_microcode_intel()
Commit-ID: 26cbaa4dc676a444aa626cbc642c4c8181ef1378
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/26cbaa4dc676a444aa626cbc642c4c8181ef1378
Author: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
AuthorDate: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 12:33:39 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:41:17 +0100
x86/microcode/intel: Cleanup apply_microcode_intel()
Get rid of local variable cpu_num as it is equal to @cpu now. Deref
cpu_data() only when it is really needed at the end.
No functionality change.
Tested-by: Thomas Voegtle <tv@...96.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1454499225-21544-12-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index c029c2b..35186a0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -839,12 +839,11 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
{
struct microcode_intel *mc;
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci;
+ struct cpuinfo_x86 *c;
unsigned int val[2];
- int cpu_num = raw_smp_processor_id();
- struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu_num);
/* We should bind the task to the CPU */
- if (WARN_ON(cpu_num != cpu))
+ if (WARN_ON(raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu))
return -1;
uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
@@ -874,15 +873,18 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
if (val[1] != mc->hdr.rev) {
pr_err("CPU%d update to revision 0x%x failed\n",
- cpu_num, mc->hdr.rev);
+ cpu, mc->hdr.rev);
return -1;
}
+
pr_info("CPU%d updated to revision 0x%x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x\n",
- cpu_num, val[1],
+ cpu, val[1],
mc->hdr.date & 0xffff,
mc->hdr.date >> 24,
(mc->hdr.date >> 16) & 0xff);
+ c = &cpu_data(cpu);
+
uci->cpu_sig.rev = val[1];
c->microcode = val[1];
Powered by blists - more mailing lists