linux-kernel - [tip:x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Cleanup get_matching_model

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 9 Feb 2016 04:25:25 -0800
From:	tip-bot for Borislav Petkov <tipbot@...or.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
	tv@...96.de, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	bp@...e.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: [tip:x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel:
  Cleanup get_matching_model_microcode()

Commit-ID:  f96fde531946524b26d25d4eed9625695837f524
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/f96fde531946524b26d25d4eed9625695837f524
Author:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
AuthorDate: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 12:33:43 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:41:18 +0100

x86/microcode/intel: Cleanup get_matching_model_microcode()

Reflow arguments, sort local variables in reverse christmas tree, kill
"out" label.

No functionality change.

Tested-by: Thomas Voegtle <tv@...96.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1454499225-21544-16-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 25 +++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index 0c67fd0..cb397947 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -287,19 +287,17 @@ static unsigned int _save_mc(struct microcode_intel **mc_saved,
  * BSP can stay in the platform.
  */
 static enum ucode_state __init
-get_matching_model_microcode(unsigned long start,
-			     void *data, size_t size,
-			     struct mc_saved_data *mcs,
-			     unsigned long *mc_ptrs,
+get_matching_model_microcode(unsigned long start, void *data, size_t size,
+			     struct mc_saved_data *mcs, unsigned long *mc_ptrs,
 			     struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
 {
-	u8 *ucode_ptr = data;
-	unsigned int leftover = size;
-	enum ucode_state state = UCODE_OK;
-	unsigned int mc_size;
-	struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header;
 	struct microcode_intel *mc_saved_tmp[MAX_UCODE_COUNT];
+	struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header;
 	unsigned int num_saved = mcs->num_saved;
+	enum ucode_state state = UCODE_OK;
+	unsigned int leftover = size;
+	u8 *ucode_ptr = data;
+	unsigned int mc_size;
 	int i;
 
 	while (leftover && num_saved < ARRAY_SIZE(mc_saved_tmp)) {
@@ -321,8 +319,7 @@ get_matching_model_microcode(unsigned long start,
 		 * the platform, we need to find and save microcode patches
 		 * with the same family and model as the BSP.
 		 */
-		if (matching_model_microcode(mc_header, uci->cpu_sig.sig) !=
-			 UCODE_OK) {
+		if (matching_model_microcode(mc_header, uci->cpu_sig.sig) != UCODE_OK) {
 			ucode_ptr += mc_size;
 			continue;
 		}
@@ -334,19 +331,19 @@ get_matching_model_microcode(unsigned long start,
 
 	if (leftover) {
 		state = UCODE_ERROR;
-		goto out;
+		return state;
 	}
 
 	if (!num_saved) {
 		state = UCODE_NFOUND;
-		goto out;
+		return state;
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < num_saved; i++)
 		mc_ptrs[i] = (unsigned long)mc_saved_tmp[i] - start;
 
 	mcs->num_saved = num_saved;
-out:
+
 	return state;
 }