[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1602091458330.25254@nanos>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 15:00:21 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
cc: jolsa@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bp@...e.de,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, acme@...hat.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, eranian@...gle.com,
peterz@...radead.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Move perf_event.c ............... =>
x86/events/core.c
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2016, tip-bot for Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> > Commit-ID: fa9cbf320e996eaa3d219344b6f7013b096cafd9
> > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/fa9cbf320e996eaa3d219344b6f7013b096cafd9
> > Author: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> > AuthorDate: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 17:09:04 +0100
> > Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> > CommitDate: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 10:23:49 +0100
> >
> > perf/x86: Move perf_event.c ............... => x86/events/core.c
> >
> > Also, keep the churn at minimum by adjusting the include "perf_event.h"
> > when each file gets moved.
>
> I have to admit I've been falling behind on my lkml reading, but is there
> a good reason for moving all these files around?
>
> I'm often using "git blame" to track down when bugs are introduced, and
> it's a big pain trying to do that across file moves like this. Although
> that's maybe just due to difficiencies in my git usage skills.
git blame still tells you which commit modified a particular line. That's not
lost accross a file move.
git log stops per default when a file moved, but you can tell it not to do so
via "--follow".
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists