[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4571887.rTPndCnv20@wuerfel>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 16:26:38 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty/serial: digicolor: Fix bad usage of IS_ERR_VALUE
On Tuesday 09 February 2016 07:08:59 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> IS_ERR_VALUE() assumes that its parameter is an unsigned long.
> It can not be used to check if an unsigned int reflects an error.
> Doing so can result in the following build warning.
>
> drivers/tty/serial/digicolor-usart.c: In function ‘digicolor_uart_probe’:
> include/linux/err.h:21:38: warning:
> comparison is always false due to limited range of data type
> drivers/tty/serial/digicolor-usart.c:485:6: note:
> in expansion of macro ‘IS_ERR_VALUE’
>
> If that warning is seen, an error return from platform_get_irq() is missed.
>
>
The patch looks correct to me, but what compiler version and which kernel
tree is it that triggered the warning?
Andrzej Hajda just modified the definition of IS_ERR_VALUE(), and the
changes are still under discussion, but I don't see that warning with
any of the versions.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists