[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56BA0ECE.2050106@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 17:07:42 +0100
From: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, srostedt@...hat.com,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: avoid livelock if another CPU printks continuously
On 02/09/2016 04:50 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> One thing is to find the spamming code and fix that.
We can't rely that there won't be never-ending concurrent printks,
right? For one, in many setups user can cause printk flood.
I think we must ensure that printk does not livelock.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists