linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 9

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3600593.0vxxUHHYns@wuerfel>
Date:	Tue, 09 Feb 2016 17:08:44 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Linux-Next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
	Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	Laura Abbott <labbott@...oraproject.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 9

On Tuesday 09 February 2016 16:01:18 Mark Rutland wrote:
> That builds fine for me atop of for-next/pgtable, both 64-bit and
> 32-bit.
> 
> GCC seems to treat enum fixed_addresses the same as unsigned. Only if I
> change the type of idx in fixmap.h (e.g. to char) do I get a conflict
> against paravirt.h

Interesting.


The patch seems fine then:

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>