[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5968234.D2a3VCM72k@wuerfel>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 17:27:05 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@...wei.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)" <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
"Wangzhou (B)" <wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>,
"liudongdong (C)" <liudongdong3@...wei.com>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>, qiujiang <qiujiang@...wei.com>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com" <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
"tn@...ihalf.com" <tn@...ihalf.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"xuwei (O)" <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"jcm@...hat.com" <jcm@...hat.com>,
zhangjukuo <zhangjukuo@...wei.com>,
"Liguozhu (Kenneth)" <liguozhu@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] PCI: hisi: re-architect Hip05/Hip06 controllers driver to preapare for ACPI
On Monday 08 February 2016 16:51:19 Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann [mailto:arnd@...db.de]
> > On Monday 08 February 2016 16:06:54 Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> > > > On Monday 08 February 2016 12:41:02 Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> > int
> > > > size,
> > > > > + u32 *val)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + u32 reg;
> > > > > + u32 reg_val;
> > > > > + void *walker = ®_val;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + walker += (where & 0x3);
> > > > > + reg = where & ~0x3;
> > > > > + reg_val = readl(reg_base + reg);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (size == 1)
> > > > > + *val = *(u8 __force *) walker;
> > > > > + else if (size == 2)
> > > > > + *val = *(u16 __force *) walker;
> > > > > + else if (size == 4)
> > > > > + *val = reg_val;
> > > > > + else
> > > > > + return PCIBIOS_BAD_REGISTER_NUMBER;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
> > > > > +}
> > > >
> > > > Isn't this the same hack that Qualcomm are using?
> > >
> > > As far as I can see Qualcomm defines its own config access
> > > mechanism only for RC config read and also it seems they're
> > > having problems with reporting the device class...
> > >
> > > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/pci/host/pcie-
> > qcom.c#L474
> > >
> > > Our problem is that our HW can only perform 32b rd/wr accesses
> > > So we can't use readw/readb/writew/writeb...
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Sorry, my mistake, I meant Cavium not Qualcomm.
> > See https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/5/689 for the patches.
>
> Well, looking at it Cavium seems quite different,
>
> On read they need to trigger the retrieval of the
> config space info writing to the lower 32b of a 64b register,
> then they need to read data back on the upper 64b of the
> same register and adjust the content to remove the garbage...
>
> We just use 32b accesses and adjust grab the appropriate
> bytes depending on the read/write sizes...
Hmm, I must have misremembered that too then, let me try once more ;-)
The above appears to reimplement pci_generic_config_read32(). Can you
just use that instead?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists