lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 9 Feb 2016 18:34:42 +0100
From:	Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl>
To:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
Cc:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
	Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>,
	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/16] dell-smbios: don't return an SMBIOS buffer from
 dell_smbios_send_request()

> > > > An SMBIOS buffer pointer does not need to be returned by
> > > > dell_smbios_send_request(), because SMBIOS call results are stored in
> > > > the buffer passed as input.
> In my tree, I reworded this as:
> 
>     dell-smbios: don't return an SMBIOS buffer from dell_smbios_send_request()
> 
>     An SMBIOS buffer pointer does not need to be returned by
>     dell_smbios_send_request(), because SMBIOS call results are stored in
>     the buffer exported by the module.
> 
> Is that acceptable?

Sure, thanks.  I saw the edited commit message in your tree before
sending my previous message and I liked it.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Kępień

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ