linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] tpmdd fixes for Linux 4.5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1602091159440.6966@namei.org>
Date:	Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:59:57 +1100 (AEDT)
From:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
cc:	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tpmdd fixes for Linux 4.5

On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:

> James,
> 
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 01:39:03AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Hi James,
> > 
> > This pull request contains three small cleanups, a bug fix for policy
> > based sealing, a bug fix for attach/detach of the platform device for
> > tpm_tis and resource locking for tpm_tis and tpm_crb.
> 
> I have 3-4 small scope fixes for the release that have been implemented
> after this.
> 
> Since it's bee a while since this pull request should I create a new one
> and include those or do you want to pull this first?
> 
> I could rebase that new pull request to -rc3 to which security/next is
> now rebased.
> 

The latter is probably best.


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>