linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mips: Differentiate between 32 and 64 bit ELF header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56BAD881.9000208@bmw-carit.de>
Date:	Wed, 10 Feb 2016 07:28:17 +0100
From:	Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
To:	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...tec.com>
CC:	kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, <kbuild-all@...org>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mips: Differentiate between 32 and 64 bit ELF
 header

On 02/09/2016 08:44 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2016, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> 
>>>  FWIW I think all the MIPS ABI flags stuff also needs to go outside the 
>>> conditional, because it's ABI agnostic.  I'll make the right change myself 
>>> on top of your fixes.  It'll remove a little bit of code duplication, 
>>> which is always welcome.
>>
>> Great, thanks for taking care of it.
> 
>  My ABI flags change has passed testing and I'm ready to post it, will you 
> be respinning your patch soon?

I was waiting for your cleanups and base my patches on top of it. Looks
like a small misunderstanding on my side :) I'll start on v4 right now.

cheers,
daniel