[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56BB0E9A.6010809@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:19:06 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
jason@...edaemon.net, rjw@...ysocki.net, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com,
robert.richter@...iumnetworks.com, shijie.huang@....com,
guohanjun@...wei.com, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com
Cc: mw@...ihalf.com, graeme.gregory@...aro.org,
Catalin.Marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
hanjun.guo@...aro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
ddaney.cavm@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 00/10] Introduce ACPI world to GICv3 & ITS irqchip
Thomasz,
On 10/02/16 08:55, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> On 19.01.2016 14:11, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>> Patches base on Suravee's ACPI GICv2m support:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/10/475
>>
>> The following git branch contains submitted patches along with
>> the useful patches from the test point of view (mainly ACPI ARM64 PCI support).
>> https://github.com/semihalf-nowicki-tomasz/linux.git (gicv3-its-acpi-v3)
>>
>
> Hi Marc,
>
> Can you please have a look at this series. I think your previous
> concerns have been addressed.
I've just acked the first 3 patches, which I believe are good to go.
The ITS support is a separate thing, mostly because it introduces a
completely new infrastructure (IORT). I'll review that separately (no
need to resend the patches though).
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists