[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160210123342.GA11415@e106622-lin>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 12:33:42 +0000
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update
callbacks
Hi Rafael,
On 09/02/16 21:05, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[...]
> +/**
> + * cpufreq_update_util - Take a note about CPU utilization changes.
> + * @util: Current utilization.
> + * @max: Utilization ceiling.
> + *
> + * This function is called by the scheduler on every invocation of
> + * update_load_avg() on the CPU whose utilization is being updated.
> + */
> +void cpufreq_update_util(unsigned long util, unsigned long max)
> +{
> + struct update_util_data *data;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> +
> + data = rcu_dereference(*this_cpu_ptr(&cpufreq_update_util_data));
> + if (data && data->func)
> + data->func(data, cpu_clock(smp_processor_id()), util, max);
Are util and max used anywhere? It seems to me that cpu_clock is used by
the callbacks to check if the sampling period is elapsed, but I couldn't
yet find who is using util and max.
Thanks,
- Juri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists