[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160210131940.GB15597@krava.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:19:40 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/23] perf top: Add --hierarchy option
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 11:37:10PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 10:01:55PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Support hierarchy output for perf-top using --hierarchy option.
> >
> > Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/Documentation/perf-top.txt | 3 +++
> > tools/perf/builtin-top.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-top.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-top.txt
> > index b0e60e17db38..19f046f027cd 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-top.txt
> > +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-top.txt
> > @@ -233,6 +233,9 @@ Default is to monitor all CPUS.
> > --raw-trace::
> > When displaying traceevent output, do not use print fmt or plugins.
> >
> > +--hierarchy::
> > + Enable hierarchy output.
> > +
> > INTERACTIVE PROMPTING KEYS
> > --------------------------
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
> > index a75de3940b97..b86b623e8799 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
> > @@ -1214,6 +1214,8 @@ int cmd_top(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
> > parse_branch_stack),
> > OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "raw-trace", &symbol_conf.raw_trace,
> > "Show raw trace event output (do not use print fmt or plugins)"),
> > + OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "hierarchy", &symbol_conf.report_hierarchy,
> > + "Show entries in a hierarchy"),
> > OPT_END()
> > };
> > const char * const top_usage[] = {
> > @@ -1241,6 +1243,19 @@ int cmd_top(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
> > goto out_delete_evlist;
> > }
> >
> > + if (symbol_conf.report_hierarchy) {
> > + /* disable incompatible options */
> > + symbol_conf.event_group = false;
> > + symbol_conf.cumulate_callchain = false;
> > +
> > + if (field_order) {
> > + pr_err("Error: --hierarchy and --fields options cannot be used together\n");
> > + parse_options_usage(top_usage, options, "fields", 0);
> > + parse_options_usage(NULL, options, "hierarchy", 0);
> > + goto out_delete_evlist;
> > + }
> > + }
>
> I was wondering about this when I was going through the patchset ;-)
but isn't that too restricting? hows about fields like
overhead_sys/us, samples, period
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists