[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160210141616.GA4301@danjae.kornet>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 23:16:16 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/23] perf hists: Support filtering in hierarchy mode
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 01:11:19PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 10:01:45PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > + /* force to go to sibling in the hierarchy */
> > + saved_unfolded = h->unfolded;
> > + h->unfolded = false;
> > +
> > + nd = rb_hierarchy_next(&h->rb_node);
> > + h->unfolded = saved_unfolded;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* resort output (top-level entries only) */
> > + nd = rb_first(&hists->entries);
> > + while (nd) {
> > + struct hist_entry *h = rb_entry(nd, struct hist_entry, rb_node);
> > +
> > + nd = rb_next(nd);
> > + rb_erase(&h->rb_node, &hists->entries);
> > +
> > + __hists__insert_output_entry(&tmp, h, 0, false);
> > + }
>
> what's the purpose of this resort? the only affect I see
> is to recalculate callchains
Filter can change parent entries' period so we need to resort after
applying a filter and this is why I pass 'false' for the
'use_callchain' param.
For example, let's say there're two top-level entries: A and B. The A
has 40% overhead and the B has 30%. But after applying filter the A
can have 10% and the B can have 15%. So output should be changed to
put the B before the A.
I'll add a comment for this.
Thanks,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists