[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1455116893.8878.15.camel@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 16:08:13 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
USB <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] usb: type-c: USB Type-C Connector System Software
Interface
On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 16:24 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 13:56 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> > +err:
> >> > + if (i > 0)
> >> > + for (; i >= 0; i--, con--)
> >> > + typec_unregister_port(con->port);
> >>
> >> Perhaps
> >>
> >> while (--i >= 0) {
> >> ...
> >> }
> >
> > While we are at it. No we should not change the semantics
> > of conditionals for the sake of appearance.
>
> I'm sorry I didn't get you.
> How this more or less standard pattern to clean up stuff on error path
> does with conditional semantics?
You change a postdecrement to a predecrement. The highest
number the loop is executed for is changed.
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists