linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 8/9] rfkill: Userspace control for airplane mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Feb 2016 18:12:41 +0100
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>
Cc:	João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux@...lessm.com,
	João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@...lessm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] rfkill: Userspace control for airplane mode

On 2016-02-10 17:53, Dan Williams wrote:
> Yeah, I get that now.  It's just that to me, something called
> "AIRPLANE_MODE_CHANGE" seems like it should actually change airplane
> mode on/off, which implies killing radios.  I wouldn't have had the
> problem if it was named AIRPLANE_MODE_INDICATOR_CHANGE, which makes it
> clear this is simply an indicator and has no actual effect on anything
> other than a LED.

Yeah, I agree. I'm not even sure that it's a good idea to subsume this 
into the regular operations in the API, although that's obviously the 
easiest extension. I'll need to think about that a bit more with the 
code at hand though.

johannes