linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/14] mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Use clkdev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160210183504.GG30978@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:35:04 -0800
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/14] mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Use clkdev_create()

On 02/10, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Feb 2016, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> 
> > Convert this driver to use clkdev_create() instead of
> > clk_register_clkdevs(). The latter API is only used by this driver,
> > although this driver only allocates one clk to add anyway.
> > Furthermore, this driver allocates the clk_lookup structure with
> > devm, but clkdev_drop() will free that structure when passed,
> > leading to a double free when this driver is removed. Clean it
> > all up and pave the way for the removal of clk_register_clkdevs().
> > 
> > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c | 26 +++++++++-----------------
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> I never much liked this code [0]
> 
> Glad for it to be simplified.
> 
> Applied, thanks.
> 

Can you please ack the patch instead? I'd like to take it through
the clk tree so that I can remove clk_register_clkdevs() as well.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project