[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56BBA3F0.4010908@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 03:56:16 +0700
From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
To: <fu.wei@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <pawel.moll@....com>,
<mark.rutland@....com>, <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
<galak@...eaurora.org>, <wim@...ana.be>, <linux@...ck-us.net>,
<corbet@....net>, <catalin.marinas@....com>, <will.deacon@....com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>, <rruigrok@...eaurora.org>,
<harba@...eaurora.org>, <cov@...eaurora.org>,
<timur@...eaurora.org>, <dyoung@...hat.com>, <panand@...hat.com>,
<graeme.gregory@...aro.org>, <al.stone@...aro.org>,
<hanjun.guo@...aro.org>, <jcm@...hat.com>, <arnd@...db.de>,
<leo.duran@....com>, <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/4] ARM64: add SBSA Generic Watchdog device node in
amd-seattle-soc.dtsi
Hi Fu Wei,
On 2/10/16 00:00, fu.wei@...aro.org wrote:
> From: Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>
>
> This can be a example of adding SBSA Generic Watchdog device node
> into some dts files for the Soc which contains SBSA Generic Watchdog.
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi
> index 2874d92..67eb636 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi
> @@ -84,6 +84,15 @@
> clock-names = "uartclk", "apb_pclk";
> };
>
> + watchdog0: watchdog@...b0000 {
> + compatible = "arm,sbsa-gwdt";
> + reg = <0x0 0xe0bc0000 0 0x1000>,
> + <0x0 0xe0bb0000 0 0x1000>;
> + interrupts = <0 337 4>;
> + timeout-sec = <15>;
> + status = "disabled";
Could you please remove this status line? I do not think it is necessary
for this one here anymore.
Thanks,
Suravee
> + };
> +
> spi0: ssp@...20000 {
> status = "disabled";
> compatible = "arm,pl022", "arm,primecell";
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists