[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160211075720.GA895@swordfish>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:57:20 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@...nel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>,
Calvin Owens <calvinowens@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 1/4] printk: move can_use_console out of
console_trylock_for_printk
Hello Petr,
On (02/10/16 17:48), Petr Mladek wrote:
[..]
> I would personally remove console_trylock_for_printk() already in this
> patch. I mean to fold the 3rd patch into this one.
will do.
> > int printk_delay_msec __read_mostly;
>
> > @@ -2247,9 +2233,21 @@ void console_unlock(void)
> > do_cond_resched = console_may_schedule;
> > console_may_schedule = 0;
> >
> > +again:
> > + /*
> > + * We released the console_sem lock, so we need to recheck if
> > + * cpu is online and (if not) is there at least one CON_ANYTIME
> > + * console.
> > + */
> > + if (!can_use_console()) {
> > + console_locked = 0;
> > + up_console_sem();
> > + return;
> > + }
>
> This is a bug fix and a nice clean up together.
>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
thanks.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists