[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160211084230.GB29683@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 09:42:30 +0100
From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@....de>
To: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/8] ppc64 ftrace_with_regs configuration variables
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 06:48:17PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 17:25 +0100, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> > +
> > +echo "int func() { return 0; }" | \
> > + $* -S -x c -O2 -p -mprofile-kernel - -o - 2> /dev/null | \
> > + sed -n -e '/func:/,/bl _mcount/p' | grep -q TOC
> > +
> > +leaf_toc_result=$?
> > +
>
> leaf_toc_result failed for me with gcc 5. I'll try and grab gcc-6
> and give the patches a spin
Don't bother. _All_ gccs are broken in that respect currently.
AFAIK Anton is working on this. You have to fake the test, like
static int a; return a++;
Gcc fails to set the TOC for profiled "leaf" functions, where it
thinks no global/static symbols are referenced.
Torsten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists