linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] irqchip: introduce the Alpine MSIX driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Feb 2016 13:41:48 +0000
From:	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To:	Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>,
	tglx@...utronix.de, jason@...edaemon.net, tsahee@...apurnalabs.com
Cc:	rshitrit@...apurnalabs.com, thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] irqchip: introduce the Alpine MSIX driver

Antoine,

On 10/02/16 13:22, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This series introduce the Alpine MSIX driver, and enables it in both
> the Alpine v1 and Alpine v2 device trees.
> 
> This series depends on "[PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: introduce the Alpine support":
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/10/83
> 
> You can find the series at:
> https://github.com/atenart/linux.git 4.5-rc1/alpinev2-msix

So I'm quite happy with this as it is (modulo the documentation fix on
patch 3). I can take the first 3 patches through my GIC tree, but the
last 4 patches depend on your other series.

Would it be a problem to get these 4 patches merged after 4.6-rc1, so
that all the code can be merged before?

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...