[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56BC8F9C.3060505@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 13:41:48 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>,
tglx@...utronix.de, jason@...edaemon.net, tsahee@...apurnalabs.com
Cc: rshitrit@...apurnalabs.com, thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] irqchip: introduce the Alpine MSIX driver
Antoine,
On 10/02/16 13:22, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This series introduce the Alpine MSIX driver, and enables it in both
> the Alpine v1 and Alpine v2 device trees.
>
> This series depends on "[PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: introduce the Alpine support":
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/10/83
>
> You can find the series at:
> https://github.com/atenart/linux.git 4.5-rc1/alpinev2-msix
So I'm quite happy with this as it is (modulo the documentation fix on
patch 3). I can take the first 3 patches through my GIC tree, but the
last 4 patches depend on your other series.
Would it be a problem to get these 4 patches merged after 4.6-rc1, so
that all the code can be merged before?
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists