[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1455200516-132137-5-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 17:21:32 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCHv2 04/28] mm: make remove_migration_ptes() beyond mm/migration.c
The patch makes remove_migration_ptes() available to be used in
split_huge_page().
New parameter 'locked' added: as with try_to_umap() we need a way to
indicate that caller holds rmap lock.
We also shouldn't try to mlock() pte-mapped huge pages: pte-mapeed THP
pages are never mlocked.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
---
include/linux/rmap.h | 2 ++
mm/migrate.c | 15 +++++++++------
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rmap.h b/include/linux/rmap.h
index 3d975e2252d4..49eb4f8ebac9 100644
--- a/include/linux/rmap.h
+++ b/include/linux/rmap.h
@@ -243,6 +243,8 @@ int page_mkclean(struct page *);
*/
int try_to_munlock(struct page *);
+void remove_migration_ptes(struct page *old, struct page *new, bool locked);
+
/*
* Called by memory-failure.c to kill processes.
*/
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index 17db63b2dd36..993390dcf68d 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static int remove_migration_pte(struct page *new, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
else
page_add_file_rmap(new);
- if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
+ if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED && !PageCompound(new))
mlock_vma_page(new);
/* No need to invalidate - it was non-present before */
@@ -187,14 +187,17 @@ out:
* Get rid of all migration entries and replace them by
* references to the indicated page.
*/
-static void remove_migration_ptes(struct page *old, struct page *new)
+void remove_migration_ptes(struct page *old, struct page *new, bool locked)
{
struct rmap_walk_control rwc = {
.rmap_one = remove_migration_pte,
.arg = old,
};
- rmap_walk(new, &rwc);
+ if (locked)
+ rmap_walk_locked(new, &rwc);
+ else
+ rmap_walk(new, &rwc);
}
/*
@@ -706,7 +709,7 @@ static int writeout(struct address_space *mapping, struct page *page)
* At this point we know that the migration attempt cannot
* be successful.
*/
- remove_migration_ptes(page, page);
+ remove_migration_ptes(page, page, false);
rc = mapping->a_ops->writepage(page, &wbc);
@@ -904,7 +907,7 @@ static int __unmap_and_move(struct page *page, struct page *newpage,
if (page_was_mapped)
remove_migration_ptes(page,
- rc == MIGRATEPAGE_SUCCESS ? newpage : page);
+ rc == MIGRATEPAGE_SUCCESS ? newpage : page, false);
out_unlock_both:
unlock_page(newpage);
@@ -1074,7 +1077,7 @@ static int unmap_and_move_huge_page(new_page_t get_new_page,
if (page_was_mapped)
remove_migration_ptes(hpage,
- rc == MIGRATEPAGE_SUCCESS ? new_hpage : hpage);
+ rc == MIGRATEPAGE_SUCCESS ? new_hpage : hpage, false);
unlock_page(new_hpage);
--
2.7.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists