[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160211213356.26445.26458@quark.deferred.io>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 13:33:56 -0800
From: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
sboyd@...eaurora.org, lee.jones@...aro.org,
maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
geert@...ux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC RFT 0/3] clk: detect per-user enable imbalances and implement
hand-off
Quoting Michael Turquette (2015-12-04 16:46:28)
> Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > Am Freitag, 7. August 2015, 12:09:27 schrieb Michael Turquette:
> > > This is an alternative solution to Lee's "clk: Provide support for
> > > always-on clocks" series[0].
> > >
> > > The first two patches introduce run-time checks to ensure that clock
> > > consumer drivers are respecting the clk.h api. The former patch checks
> > > for prepare and enable imbalances. The latter checks for calls to
> > > clk_put without first disabling and unpreparing the clk.
> > >
> > > The third patch introduces a new flag, CLK_ENABLE_HAND_OFF, which
> > > prepares and enables a clk at registration-time. The reference counts
> > > (prepare & enable) are transferred to the first clock consumer driver
> > > that clk_get's the clk with this flag set AND calls clk_prepare or
> > > clk_enable.
> > >
> > > The net result is that a clock with this flag set will be enabled at
> > > boot and neither the clk_disable_unused garbage collector or the
> > > "sibling clock disables a shared parent" scenario will cause the flagged
> > > clock to be disabled. The first driver to come along and explicitly
> > > claim, prepare and enable this clock will inherit those reference
> > > counts. No change to clock consumer drivers is required for this to
> > > work. Please continue to use the clk.h api properly.
> >
> > just out of curiosity, did this move anywhere yet? (Last message from october
> > 1st it seems)
> >
> > It looks like it is needed to fix the orphan-deferral I need on Rockchip that
> > breaks sunxi in its current state.
>
> Yes, I'm preparing another version. Sorry for high latency, but I've been
> traveling for more than 2 months non-stop.
Done. See:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<1455225554-13267-1-git-send-email-mturquette@...libre.com>
Regards,
Mike
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > Heiko
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists