linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 03/12] dtb: amd: Fix DMA ranges in device tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 12 Feb 2016 05:59:56 +0700
From:	Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
To:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
CC:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	"Pawel Moll" <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>, <brijeshkumar.singh@....com>,
	Thomas Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
	"Leo Duran" <leo.duran@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 03/12] dtb: amd: Fix DMA ranges in device tree

Ok, I'll send the incremental patch out again.

Thanks,
Suravee

On 2/12/16 04:23, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Suravee Suthikulpanit
> <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com> wrote:
>> Hi Arnd,
>>
>>
>> On 2/9/16 21:57, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>
>>> On Monday 08 February 2016 11:59:08 Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
>>>>
>>>> Fix DMA ranges of smb0 and pcie0 nodes in AMD Seattle SOC.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
>>>>
>>>
>>> This could use a changelog text to explain why it's broken and how the
>>> fix works.
>>>
>>>          Arnd
>>>
>>
>> So, I have not experience the breakage. However, IIUC, the GICv2m MSI frame
>> is also considered DMA-able. So, I think it should be included in the
>> dma-range specified here. Please let me know if my assumption is incorrect.
>> Otherwise, I will include more description in the commit log in my next rev.
>
> As I replied when I did it -- I've applied the patches, so respinning
> won't work. Instead, please follow up with incremental fixes to this
> series instead.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Olof
>