linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] clk: qcom: gdsc: Add support for votable gdscs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160212003114.GO30978@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:31:14 -0800
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	mturquette@...libre.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] clk: qcom: gdsc: Add support for votable gdscs

On 12/01, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> Some gdscs might be controlled via voting registers and might not
> really disable when the kernel intends to disable them (due to other
> votes keeping them enabled)
> Mark these gdscs with a flag for we do not check/wait on a disable
> status for these gdscs within the kernel disable callback.
> 
> Also at boot, if these GDSCs are found to be ON, we make sure we
> vote for them before we inform the genpd framework about their
> status. If genpd gets no users, it then disables (removes the vote)
> them as part of genpd_poweroff_unused()
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
> ---

Applied to clk-next

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project