[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1602121318080.1773@schleppi>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:21:46 +0100 (CET)
From: Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] random kernel crashes after THP rework on s390 (maybe also
on PowerPC and ARM)
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 09:09:42PM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 07:22:23PM +0100, Gerald Schaefer wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Sebastian Ott reported random kernel crashes beginning with v4.5-rc1 and
> > > he also bisected this to commit 61f5d698 "mm: re-enable THP". Further
> > > review of the THP rework patches, which cannot be bisected, revealed
> > > commit fecffad "s390, thp: remove infrastructure for handling splitting PMDs"
> > > (and also similar commits for other archs).
> > >
> > > This commit removes the THP splitting bit and also the architecture
> > > implementation of pmdp_splitting_flush(), which took care of the IPI for
> > > fast_gup serialization. The commit message says
> > >
> > > pmdp_splitting_flush() is not needed too: on splitting PMD we will do
> > > pmdp_clear_flush() + set_pte_at(). pmdp_clear_flush() will do IPI as
> > > needed for fast_gup
> > >
> > > The assumption that a TLB flush will also produce an IPI is wrong on s390,
> > > and maybe also on other architectures, and I thought that this was actually
> > > the main reason for having an arch-specific pmdp_splitting_flush().
> > >
> > > At least PowerPC and ARM also had an individual implementation of
> > > pmdp_splitting_flush() that used kick_all_cpus_sync() instead of a TLB
> > > flush to send the IPI, and those were also removed. Putting the arch
> > > maintainers and mailing lists on cc to verify.
> > >
> > > On s390 this will break the IPI serialization against fast_gup, which
> > > would certainly explain the random kernel crashes, please revert or fix
> > > the pmdp_splitting_flush() removal.
> >
> > Sorry for that.
> >
> > I believe, the problem was already addressed for PowerPC:
> >
> > http://lkml.kernel.org/g/454980831-16631-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
>
> Correct link is
>
> http://lkml.kernel.org/g/1454980831-16631-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
>
Based on your suggestion Gerald provided the following patch but sadly it
didn't fix the problem.
Sebastian
---
arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -1587,6 +1587,8 @@ static inline void pmdp_invalidate(struc
unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmdp)
{
pmdp_flush_direct(vma->vm_mm, address, pmdp);
+ /* Serialize against fast_gup with IPI */
+ kick_all_cpus_sync();
}
#define __HAVE_ARCH_PMDP_SET_WRPROTECT
Powered by blists - more mailing lists