linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] selftests: Add test for sigaltstack(SS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56BE057E.4050101@list.ru>
Date:	Fri, 12 Feb 2016 19:17:02 +0300
From:	Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>
To:	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
	Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] selftests: Add test for sigaltstack(SS_DISABLE)
 inside sighandler

12.02.2016 19:12, Shuah Khan пишет:
> On 01/31/2016 09:18 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>>
>> sigaltstack needs to be disabled before the signal handler can
>> safely use swapcontext(). Unfortunately linux implementation of
>> sigaltstack() returns EPERM in that case.
>> Re-enabling is also needed and tested.
>>
>> CC: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
>> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> CC: linux-api@...r.kernel.org
>> CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> 
> Hi Stas,
> 
> Is this patch v4 or Patch 1/4. Confirming to see if
> I am missing 3 patches or this is supposed to be
> version 4 of a single patch.
Hi, I used get_maintainer.pl for the CC list, so you indeed
were CCed with just this patch, which is one of 4.
The series were however rejected, and I am planning to submit
another one later.