[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160212170308.GC7928@thunk.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 12:03:08 -0500
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Georg Altmann <george@...rge-net.de>
Cc: adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: clarify error messages for mounting fs w/o journal
/w journal options
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 02:31:49PM +0100, Georg Altmann wrote:
> Previous message was hard to understand: When mounting a ext4 fs without a
> journal, but a mount option that controls journaling is used, clearly state
> that the fs cannot be mounted with this option because it has no journal.
Well, technically it's possible for the file system to have a journal,
but for journalling not to be enabled. For example:
root@...-xfstests:~# dmesg -n 7
root@...-xfstests:~# mke2fs -t ext4 -Fq /dev/vdc
/dev/vdc contains a ext4 file system
created on Fri Feb 12 11:59:10 2016
root@...-xfstests:~# dumpe2fs /dev/vdc | grep features
dumpe2fs 1.43-WIP (18-May-2015)
Filesystem features: has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index filetype extent 64bit flex_bg sparse_super large_file huge_file dir_nlink extra_isize metadata_csum
Journal features: (none)
root@...-xfstests:~# mount -o noload,commit=1 /dev/vdc /vdc 2> /dev/null
[ 313.867505] EXT4-fs (vdc): can't mount with commit=1, fs mounted w/o journal
So saying "fs has no journal" isn't necessarily going to be correct.
Maybe "Can't mount with data=xxx, journalling not enabled" would be
less confusing to users?
Cheers,
- Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists