linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scripts/dtc: dtx_diff

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56BE1875.5010307@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 12 Feb 2016 09:37:57 -0800
From:	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/dtc: dtx_diff - add info to error message

On 2/11/2016 5:41 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com> wrote:
>> On 2/2/2016 11:02 AM, Frank Rowand wrote:
>>> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...ymobile.com>
>>>
>>> If kernel config options are not properly set, "make scripts" will not
>>> compile dtc.  Update the unable to find dtc error message to check
>>> the kernel config and give better advice on how to create dtc.
>>>
>>> Reword another error message to increase clarity.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...ymobile.com>
>>
>> < snip >
>>
>> Ping, no reply on original email.
> 
> No comment, no reply. I only reply with "applied" when I actually
> apply stuff which tends to be at least several weeks. Otherwise, I
> might tell you applied and then miss it. :)
> 
> Anyway, now applied.
> 
>> In the thread about the of ir msi-map patch you mentioned that you have nothing
>> else queued for 4.5.  Is dtx_diff (and hopefully this patch) queued up for 4.6?
>> If so, could they instead go into 4.5 since they are support tools, and do not
>> directly impact the kernel?
> 
> It's not a fix either though, so no, it's queued for 4.6 and has been
> since -rc1.
> 
> Rob
> 

Ok, thanks!

-Frank