lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56BE2084.4080101@virtuozzo.com>
Date:	Fri, 12 Feb 2016 10:12:20 -0800
From:	Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@...tuozzo.com>
To:	Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>
CC:	<kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
	<gleb@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: do not SetPageDirty from kvm_set_pfn_dirty for file
 mappings

On 02/12/2016 05:48 AM, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@...tuozzo.com> writes:
>
>> The patch solves the following problem: file system specific routines
>> involved in ordinary routine writeback process BUG_ON page_buffers()
>> because a page goes to writeback without buffer-heads attached.
>>
>> The way how kvm_set_pfn_dirty calls SetPageDirty works only for anon
>> mappings. For file mappings it is obviously incorrect - there page_mkwrite
>> must be called. It's not easy to add page_mkwrite call to kvm_set_pfn_dirty
>> because there is no universal way to find vma by pfn. But actually
>> SetPageDirty may be simply skipped in those cases. Below is a
>> justification.
> Confirm. I've hit that BUGON
> [ 4442.219121] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 4442.219188] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:2285!
> <...>
>
>> When guest modifies the content of a page with file mapping, kernel kvm
>> makes the page dirty by the following call-path:
>>
>> vmx_handle_exit ->
>>   handle_ept_violation ->
>>    __get_user_pages ->
>>     page_mkwrite ->
>>      SetPageDirty
>>
>> Since then, the page is dirty from both guest and host point of view. Then
>> the host makes writeback and marks the page as write-protected. So any
>> further write from the guest triggers call-path above again.
> Please elaborate exact call-path which marks host-page.

wb_workfn ->
  wb_do_writeback ->
   wb_writeback ->
    __writeback_inodes_wb ->
     writeback_sb_inodes ->
      __writeback_single_inode ->
       do_writepages ->
        ext4_writepages ->
         mpage_prepare_extent_to_map ->
          mpage_process_page_bufs ->
           mpage_submit_page ->
            clear_page_dirty_for_io ->
              page_mkclean ->
               rmap_walk->
                 rmap_walk_file ->
                  page_mkclean_one->
                   pte_wrprotect ->
                     pte_clear_flags(pte, _PAGE_RW)

Thanks,
Maxim

>> So, for file mappings, it's not possible to have new data written to a page
>> inside the guest w/o corresponding SetPageDirty on the host.
>>
>> This makes explicit SetPageDirty from kvm_set_pfn_dirty redundant.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@...tuozzo.com>
>> ---
>>   virt/kvm/kvm_main.c |    3 ++-
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> index a11cfd2..5a7d3fa 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> @@ -1582,7 +1582,8 @@ void kvm_set_pfn_dirty(kvm_pfn_t pfn)
>>   	if (!kvm_is_reserved_pfn(pfn)) {
>>   		struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>>   
>> -		if (!PageReserved(page))
>> +		if (!PageReserved(page) &&
>> +		    (!page->mapping || PageAnon(page)))
>>   			SetPageDirty(page);
>>   	}
>>   }
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-nvdimm mailing list
>> Linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org
>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ