lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUr2-y8vrgKeDqYnMGGT3=cVL8VqEcjTBgYAW4L2R+OSA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 12 Feb 2016 10:59:10 -0800
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
Cc:	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dmi: Make dmi_walk and dmi_walk_early return real
 error codes

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 08:18:50PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
>> On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 10:13:09 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org> wrote:
>> > > If I understand this correctly, this is the first of 5 patches, and this one has
>> > > some unanswered questions from Jean here. If this patch gets respun, the
>> > > following are also impacted:
>> > >
>> > > dell-wmi: Stop storing pointers to DMI tables
>> > > dell-wmi, dell-laptop: select DMI
>> > > dell-wmi: Clean up hotkey table size check
>> > > dell-wmi: Support new hotkeys on the XPS 13 9350 (Skylake)
>> > >
>> > > Is that correct?
>> >
>> > Not really.  It's just the three patches here:
>> >
>> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.platform.x86.devel/8503
>> >
>> > This patch (the dmi_walk error code one) is no longer really related.
>> > Due to Jean's earlier comment about what happens if DMI isn't enabled
>> > at all, I no longer propagate the error code from dmi_walk in
>> > dell-wmi, so the error code won't have any effect.  (Instead I just
>> > warn and let the driver load in legacy mode, which matches the current
>> > behavior.)
>> >
>> > I think the way to go is for the v3 "dell-wmi: DMI misuse fixes"
>> > series to go in through your tree, and I'll hash out the error code
>> > thing separately with Jean.
>> >
>> > Does that seem sensible?
>>
>> Yes, I agree that this patch is independent from the dell-wmi patch
>> series now.
>
> Excellent, works for me.
>

Is any further action from me needed here?

--Andy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ